When it Stops Being Sport
There has been so much written in Australia about Essendon, and it won't stop any time soon. The pathway that the club and players are going down still has the following steps remaining:
- Go to the SUI courts to overturn CAS
- Sue the club for ruining their careers
- Sue the AFL because they didn't get anything from the club
- then undergo the various appeals processes.
- to not give them illegal drugs,
- to sign a consent form to permit the supplements program
- not take a deal which would have had the whole thing over and them not missing a game (which NRL players under similar circumstances did)
All of these recommendations benefited the club rather than the players, and following these recommendations, led to the players being described as “complicit in a culture of secrecy concealment”. This article is one of the better ones on the current status.
Having said all this, the AFL's drug problems seem trivial compared to the NFL, NBA, MLB and cycling. So it seems odd that anyone in their right mind should be recommending that the AFL adopt some of these organisations' lead and withdraw from WADA. The fact that in the NFL's recent Super Bowl, both the MVP and quarterback of the winning team, have been involved in serious drug controversy, hardly suggests it is an organisation worth following.
All of these questions and issues are just examples of the realities of high profile sport. But the issue that really needs to be addressed is that the essence of sport is competition, and for true competition to exist, the competitors have to be on a level playing field. That is, there needs to be rules that are enforced.
The point at which a sport, rather than having a hard line and saying NO, starts trying to 'manage' the process, is the point at which it is no longer a sport, and is entertainment.
Wrestling never (really) pretended to be anything other than entertainment, so when their athletes were clearly juicing it was never even commented on because it was all part of the show and it made that more spectacular. And that's ok. I love AFL, NBA, NFL (not so much MLB and cycling, sorry). I'm saddened by their stance on cheating, but I still love the entertainment of it.
Ultimately it is about the owners/guardians of the sport being greedy. They see that people who are cheating are making the sport more popular, and this justifies either tacit or actual approval of the reasons for the success. In situations like this decisions are made based on protecting the status quo of the sport as a whole and the individuals in particular. But the problem is this is a false argument. How can you say that, if Cycling during the Armstrong era was clean, someone else wouldn't have won 8 Tours in a row and the sport would be in a better place than it was and is?
When you stop caring about the integrity of the sport, because the spectacle is attracting fans, then it stops being a sport and starts being entertainment.